![droppy dogs droppy dogs](http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-imJeY17FCXc/VDvKxT4kC5I/AAAAAAAAKDk/JaU0GtB084w/s400/droopy+the+dog+1.jpg)
“I’ve dribbled them out saleswise and they’re all doing just fine.” So far, 39 dogs have gotten the ear implants. He hopes the ear implants garner “mass appeal” and in a way Neuticals hasn’t. Noteable inventions include Sweet Tube, a long plastic tube that squeezes out jelly candy, and Neuticles, hard plastic testicular implants for pets. Miller, a former newspaper editor and reporter, became a consumer products inventor after running a successful advertising business. It usually takes 30 days to make a batch of the implants. One company does the cutting of the surgical mesh from a molding, another works on inserting the floral fluroplastic spine into the mesh, and the final company sterilizes the device. Miller hired three manufacturers to make the implant, which takes four production stages. Any dog owner can help their dog’s lame ear with the device, Miller says. When you’re showing a dog, Miller says, “that’s petty cash.”īut it’s not just limited to wealthy owners or show dog owners. Most of the ones he’s sold so far are to wealthy pet owners. “Let’s face it, this is definitely a luxury item.” The surgery cost is from $300 to $600.įive years in the making and countless hours of time in research and development racked up a $30,000 price tag. The implants' popularity is yet to be determined, of course, especially in a recession. “The dog doesn’t even know it’s there, it’s so humane.” “Once you put it in, the ear will automatically stand up,” Miller says. The German man had the prototype implanted. He developed a prototype and sold it to a German dog owner who had been inquiring about getting his shepherd’s injured ear implanted. The words that ran through his brain were “surgical mesh.” The mesh prevented infections in the ears.
![droppy dogs droppy dogs](https://cafans.b-cdn.net/images/Category_28787/subcat_191929/fIoup0tN_2809182317271gpadd.jpg)
“But I knew if I gave up, then I knew I would fail.” It was killing him knowing he was creating a device that was hurting animals. The dogs used for the testing did not die in the process, Miller said. A 50 percent success rate would not cut it. Two dogs developed no infections, but two dogs did. It was softer, Miller thought, and would create less trauma and, thus, less infection.įour dogs got the silicon implants.
#Droppy dogs trial#
Infections emerge if a foreign object is placed in the ear.Ī second clinical trial had the device made of silicon sheeting. It was horrible.”ĭog ears, Miller says, are sensitive. The ear would swell up and blood and puss would spurt out. “After that, these hideous infections would develop. “Everything would go fine at first, five or six weeks,” Miller says. But the rejection rate was more than 60 percent. A veterinarian inserted the device in two dogs. Miller first made the entire implant out of fluroplastic. Every aspect of the device has a purpose after years of refinement and experimentation.